{"id":36229,"date":"2021-04-04T18:49:15","date_gmt":"2021-04-04T18:49:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.xatakaciencia.com\/psicologia\/50-anos-75-estudios-sugieren-que-ninos-ninas-no-han-cambiado-sus-preferencias-juguetes-como-monos"},"modified":"2021-04-04T18:49:15","modified_gmt":"2021-04-04T18:49:15","slug":"en-50-anos-75-estudios-sugieren-que-los-ninos-y-ninas-no-han-cambiado-sus-preferencias-por-los-juguetes-como-los-monos","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/forocilac.org\/en\/en-50-anos-75-estudios-sugieren-que-los-ninos-y-ninas-no-han-cambiado-sus-preferencias-por-los-juguetes-como-los-monos\/","title":{"rendered":"In 50 years, 75 studies suggest that boys and girls have not changed their preferences for toys (like monkeys)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\n      <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i.blogs.es\/272720\/eyeajp6weaujxnj\/1024_2000.jpg\" alt=\"En 50 a\u00f1os, 75 estudios sugieren que los ni\u00f1os y ni\u00f1as no han cambiado sus preferencias por los juguetes (como los monos)\">\n    <\/p>\n<p>There is a popular idea that is so deeply rooted that, despite the evidence, it continues to be entrenched in our thinking: that human beings are like pieces of fresh clay perfectly moldable by education or context. However, <strong>There are many features that come standard and little or nothing can be modulated<\/strong> (not to mention that those traits themselves shape the context, in turn).<\/p>\n<p><!-- BREAK 1 --><\/p>\n<p>For this reason, no matter how much effort has been made by institutions, educational centers and even television advertisements, a <a href=\"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10508-021-01989-8\">new meta-analysis<\/a> (composed of 75 studies) has not found that boys and girls have changed their preferences for toys in the last half century. <\/p>\n<p><!-- BREAK 2 --><!--more--><\/p>\n<h2>Children toys&quot;<\/h2>\n<p>Parents of young children know that boys like different toys than girls like. Children show a preference for cars, robots, soldiers, bicycles, LEGOs. Girls also like bicycles, cars and LEGOs, but they also play with dolls and stuffed animals, <strong>toys that children find least appealing for active play<\/strong>. <\/p>\n<p><!-- BREAK 3 --><\/p>\n<div class=\"article-asset-image article-asset-normal\">\n<div class=\"asset-content\">\n<p>  <img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Eyeakpawyamb2xu\" class=\"centro_sinmarco\" src=\"https:\/\/i.blogs.es\/60fc66\/eyeakpawyamb2xu\/450_1000.jpg\"><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>According to the analysis, then, boys show a strong preference for \u201cboys\u201d toys, while girls are more flexible and tend to like toys more in general, <strong>although they are also typical of children<\/strong>. <\/p>\n<p><!-- BREAK 4 --><\/p>\n<p>Is this difference in toy preference solely due to socialization from parents, other children, and the media, or are there basic perception\/action differences between men and women that make some toys better suited or more attractive to one sex than to another? <\/p>\n<p><!-- BREAK 5 --><\/p>\n<div class=\"article-asset-image article-asset-normal\">\n<div class=\"asset-content\">\n<p>  <img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Eyealm3xiae2zf\" class=\"centro_sinmarco\" src=\"https:\/\/i.blogs.es\/dfcb61\/eyealm3xiae2zf_\/450_1000.jpg\"><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>Interestingly, this trend is similar to what has been found in macaques that are offered \u201cboy\u201d and \u201cgirl\u201d toys, according to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC2755553\/\">a study conducted in 2008<\/a>, so sexually dimorphic toy preferences appear to reflect basic neurobiological differences between males and females <strong>and are not caused solely by socialization<\/strong>, as social-cognitive theories of gender role behavior have suggested.<\/p>\n<p><!-- BREAK 6 --><\/p>\n<div class=\"article-asset-video article-asset-large\">\n<div class=\"asset-content\">\n<div class=\"base-asset-video\">\n<div class=\"js-dailymotion\">\n    <script type=\"application\/json\">\n     {\"videoId\":\"x80e1zs\",\"autoplay\":true,\"title\":\"\u00bfCu\u00e1l es el juguete favorito de los monos?\"}\n    <\/script>\n   <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><script>\n (function() {\n  window._JS_MODULES = window._JS_MODULES || {};\n  var headElement = document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0];\n  if (_JS_MODULES.instagram) {\n   var instagramScript = document.createElement('script');\n   instagramScript.src = 'https:\/\/platform.instagram.com\/en_US\/embeds.js';\n   instagramScript.async = true;\n   instagramScript.defer = true;\n   headElement.appendChild(instagramScript);\n  }\n })();\n<\/script><\/p>\n<p> &#8211; <br \/> The news<br \/>\n      <a href=\"https:\/\/www.xatakaciencia.com\/psicologia\/50-anos-75-estudios-sugieren-que-ninos-ninas-no-han-cambiado-sus-preferencias-juguetes-como-monos?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=04_Apr_2021\"><br \/>\n       <em> In 50 years, 75 studies suggest that boys and girls have not changed their preferences for toys (like monkeys) <\/em><br \/>\n      <\/a><br \/>\n      was originally published in<br \/>\n      <a href=\"https:\/\/www.xatakaciencia.com\/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=04_Apr_2021\"><br \/>\n       <strong> Xataka Science <\/strong><br \/>\n      <\/a><br \/>\n            by <a\n       href=\"https:\/\/www.xatakaciencia.com\/autor\/sergio-parra?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=04_Apr_2021\"><br \/>\n       Sergio Parra<br \/>\n      <\/a><br \/>\n      . <\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/xatakaciencia\/~4\/oDofUX6yA8Q\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\" alt=\"\"\/><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\n      <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i.blogs.es\/272720\/eyeajp6weaujxnj\/1024_2000.jpg\" alt=\"En 50 a\u00f1os, 75 estudios sugieren que los ni\u00f1os y ni\u00f1as no han cambiado sus preferencias por los juguetes (como los monos)\"><\/p>\n<p>There is a popular idea that is so deeply rooted that, despite the evidence, it continues to be entrenched in our thinking: that human beings are like pieces of fresh clay perfectly moldable by education or context. However, <strong>There are many features that come standard and little or nothing can be modulated<\/strong> (not to mention that those traits themselves shape the context, in turn).<\/p>\n<p><!-- BREAK 1 --><\/p>\n<p>For this reason, no matter how much effort has been made by institutions, educational centers and even television advertisements, a <a href=\"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10508-021-01989-8\">new meta-analysis<\/a> (composed of 75 studies) has not found that boys and girls have changed their preferences for toys in the last half century. <\/p>\n<p><!-- BREAK 2 --><!--more--><\/p>\n<h2>Children toys&quot;<\/h2>\n<p>Parents of young children know that boys like different toys than girls like. Children show a preference for cars, robots, soldiers, bicycles, LEGOs. Girls also like bicycles, cars and LEGOs, but they also play with dolls and stuffed animals, <strong>toys that children find least appealing for active play<\/strong>. <\/p>\n<p><!-- BREAK 3 --><\/p>\n<div class=\"article-asset-image article-asset-normal\">\n<div class=\"asset-content\">\n<p>  <img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Eyeakpawyamb2xu\" class=\"centro_sinmarco\" src=\"https:\/\/i.blogs.es\/60fc66\/eyeakpawyamb2xu\/450_1000.jpg\">\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>According to the analysis, then, boys show a strong preference for \u201cboys\u201d toys, while girls are more flexible and tend to like toys more in general, <strong>although they are also typical of children<\/strong>. <\/p>\n<p><!-- BREAK 4 --><\/p>\n<p>Is this difference in toy preference solely due to socialization from parents, other children, and the media, or are there basic perception\/action differences between men and women that make some toys better suited or more attractive to one sex than to another? <\/p>\n<p><!-- BREAK 5 --><\/p>\n<div class=\"article-asset-image article-asset-normal\">\n<div class=\"asset-content\">\n<p>  <img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Eyealm3xiae2zf\" class=\"centro_sinmarco\" src=\"https:\/\/i.blogs.es\/dfcb61\/eyealm3xiae2zf_\/450_1000.jpg\">\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>Interestingly, this trend is similar to what has been found in macaques that are offered \u201cboy\u201d and \u201cgirl\u201d toys, according to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC2755553\/\">a study conducted in 2008<\/a>, so sexually dimorphic toy preferences appear to reflect basic neurobiological differences between males and females <strong>and are not caused solely by socialization<\/strong>, as social-cognitive theories of gender role behavior have suggested.<\/p>\n<p><!-- BREAK 6 --><\/p>\n<div class=\"article-asset-video article-asset-large\">\n<div class=\"asset-content\">\n<div class=\"base-asset-video\">\n<div class=\"js-dailymotion\">\n    <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p> &#8211; <br \/> The news<br \/>\n      <a href=\"https:\/\/www.xatakaciencia.com\/psicologia\/50-anos-75-estudios-sugieren-que-ninos-ninas-no-han-cambiado-sus-preferencias-juguetes-como-monos?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=04_Apr_2021\"><br \/>\n       <em> In 50 years, 75 studies suggest that boys and girls have not changed their preferences for toys (like monkeys) <\/em><br \/>\n      <\/a><br \/>\n      was originally published in<br \/>\n      <a href=\"https:\/\/www.xatakaciencia.com\/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=04_Apr_2021\"><br \/>\n       <strong> Xataka Science <\/strong><br \/>\n      <\/a><br \/>\n            by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.xatakaciencia.com\/autor\/sergio-parra?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=04_Apr_2021\"><br \/>\n       Sergio Parra<br \/>\n      <\/a><br \/>\n      . <\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/xatakaciencia\/~4\/oDofUX6yA8Q\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\" alt=\"\"><\/p>","protected":false},"author":19,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[125],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-36229","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-portal-3"},"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/forocilac.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36229","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/forocilac.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/forocilac.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forocilac.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/19"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forocilac.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36229"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/forocilac.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36229\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":36774,"href":"https:\/\/forocilac.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36229\/revisions\/36774"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/forocilac.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36229"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forocilac.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36229"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forocilac.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36229"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}