We should not censor research on the importance of genes in intelligence or other abilities, but rather their political use

By 19/01/2022 portal-3

No debemos censurar la investigación de la importancia de los genes en la inteligencia u otras aptitudes, sino su uso político

Intelligence, in part, is determined by genes. Skin color, however, does not influence intelligence because the genes involved in skin pigmentation are very few, so it is not precisely the skin that distinguishes us from each other.

Studying these kinds of things should not be anathema. There is always genetic influence, there is always environmental influence, and both genetic and environmental influence feed off each other in ways that we are not yet able to distinguish.


Censorships

What we should not demand is the dismissal of a professor for his ideas or approaches, as happened to Edward O. Wilson. Nor should we give a letter of nature to the harassment that they also suffered in 2017 Sergei Tabachnikov and Theodore Hill after publishing a study in Mathematical Intelligencer where a mathematical model was proposed to explain that there was more variability in intelligence between men and women (that is, that there are more geniuses among the male gender, but also more idiots).

The study was accepted after peer review, but its publication was finally withdrawn due to pressure from the Women in Mathematics association at Pennsylvania State University, among others. A scientific article is only withdrawn if it is proven that there is academic fraud, not because the ideas it conveys do not fit with our ideology.

Finally, the criticism of poorly understood genetic determinism involves the assumption of an environmental determinism so inflexible that, if true, it would turn us into puppets. Individuals lacking free will manipulated from birth by our parents, the media, culture. It didn't matter what our parents were like, what was on television or what country we were born in: we would never be free to choose. We would just be what they want us to be. We would not be responsible for our actions. We would kill others or decide to have children because we have been manipulated into it.

Those who should be imprisoned would be the promoters of those ideas and not ourselves (who, in fact, ironically, would become those who would democratically decide how to manipulate the next generation based on how we have been manipulated).

It doesn't sound even remotely less terrifying than genetic determinism.
Fortunately, things are not that simple. Neither in terms of genes, nor in terms of the environment.

To better understand this whole great debate, I recommend the following video, which analyzes the assumption of what would happen if we found a lost tribe of people with green skin who... are more intelligent than us:


The news

We should not censor research on the importance of genes in intelligence or other abilities, but rather their political use

was originally published in

Xataka Science

by
Sergio Parra

.