Posting memes mocking COVID-19 anti-vaccines has the opposite effect to that intended (which in reality we do not intend)

By portal-3

Publicar memes burlándonos de los antivacunas COVID-19 ejerce el efecto contrario al pretendido (que en realidad no pretendemos)

Post memes ridiculing those who They refuse to get vaccinated for COVID-19 It is something that has become fashionable, as have memes ridiculing those who are in favor of the vaccine.

However, neither the real objective of these memes is to change the opinions of others, nor are they very effective (rather they produce the opposite effect). In a nutshell, Posting memes on social media unlikely to change minds about vaccination.

Why do we post memes?

Two decades of research show that we post memes or any other content on social media for three fundamental reasons:

Memes Del Coronavirus 001

  • To show an idealized image from ourselves. That is to say, to sell ourselves in society.
  • To show and support our memberships in groups, whether it be our family, a political party, or our love for a sports team (also whether we are pro-science or anti-science).
  • Draw attention and receive feedback. It is a way to get attention and likes from like-minded people within the social media circle.

Cc 2754011 06762dc0332340dbacca93e5329d650c Meme Otros Somos Asi De Cafres

Influence others and change their opinions It is the fourth reason to post content on social media, but it is usually the least important for our purposes. Furthermore, this fourth reason may only be effective on the subset of people who are influential on social media, either because they are very popular and have a large following on social media or because they are experts in a particular field.

Bfbt0lrlnmddnepajdbfaexnqko8u6i Gkdpngxsjbx N7n5wujhudbknfxcggnrvgvzadwv1yswyt25qk98ojbaw0bvb2s6mcancfbmltaimk2ze4qg4zw

For most social media users the three main motivations are much more relevant. Posting a pro-vaccine meme is a way to publicly express support for vaccination and all related political and social positions associated with said support.

Vuil3dc2zva2peethrv3qsg5nu

Furthermore, as already suggested by scientific literature about itIn general, attempts to persuade someone with a point of view opposite to our own harden and polarize the target's existing attitudes. Let's not say if these attempts are covered in the sarcasm of a meme.

Captura 2

In regarding vaccinesIn addition, we are in an urgent scenario where there is an excess of contradictory information. We could try to do pedagogy, try to inform people, even try to persuade them with the best possible rhetoric. However, if this doesn't work and we are in a hurry, it would be like trying to debate with the airline passenger about how to proceed in the face of an oncoming storm.

Finally, we must place our trust, to a greater or lesser extent, in the pilot's decisions (which can be publicly audited); and to achieve this without stumbling into totalitarianism, perhaps a more useful strategy would be the so-called libertarian paternalism:


The news

Posting memes mocking COVID-19 anti-vaccines has the opposite effect to that intended (which in reality we do not intend)

was originally published in

Xataka Science

by
Sergio Parra

.

Read More

Up to a third of women surveyed would admit to going on a romantic date just to be invited to free dinner

By portal-3

Hasta un tercio de las mujeres encuestadas admitiría acudir a una cita romántica solo para ser invitada a cenar gratis

Despite the lack of romantic attraction towards a suitor, there are women who would choose to go on a romantic date to receive a free dinner from the suitor. It is what has come to be called Foodie Calls.

Although the idea of the gastronomic call has been discussed in popular media for some time, psychologists Brian Collisson, Jennifer Howell and Trista Harig have been the first to address its study in the next investigation published in
Social Psychological and Personality Science.

Foodie Call

The research is based on two studies in which women were surveyed regarding their behavior regarding foddie calls, dark triad personality traits, traditional gender role beliefs, and online dating history.

The research concludes that between 23 and 33% of the women surveyed had on some occasion deliberately misrepresented their romantic interest towards a man to have dinner at his expense.

In Study 1, dark triad beliefs and traditional gender roles significantly predicted foodie calls' prior behavior and perceived acceptability. Study 2 used more comprehensive measures and again suggested that dark triad traits (narcissism, psychopathy and Machiavellianism) predicted foodie calls and their perceived acceptability.

Collisson and his colleagues point out that the foodie perpetrator can be a man or a woman, and can happen in both same-sex and opposite-sex contexts. However, it is usually described as a case of a woman receiving a dinner offer from a man and pretending to be romantically interested just to get a free meal at a nice restaurant. For this reason, The researchers only surveyed women who identified themselves as heterosexual.

Scoring high in the traits of the dark triad means displaying these traits with greater intensity:

  • Machiavellianism. They manipulate and deceive others for their own benefit.
  • Psychopathy. They lack empathy for the plight of others and feel no remorse for their own harmful actions.
  • Narcissism. They have an inflated sense of their own importance and rights. Additionally, although they are socially skilled, they have little interest in building deep relationships with others.

More than a thousand women completed questionnaires that assessed the following:

  • Frequency of foodie calls. First, they were asked if they had ever participated in a foodie call. If they responded positively, they were asked to estimate how many times they had done it. Finally, they rated the social acceptability of this practice.
  • dark triad. Respondents answered questions from commonly used scales designed to assess the degree of Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and narcissism.
  • Gender role beliefs. Items in this questionnaire assessed respondents' endorsement of traditional gender roles. Among these, of course, was the belief that it is a man's duty to pay all expenses on a date.

However, it should be noted that the majority of the women surveyed did not approve of foodie calls or get involved in them.


The news

Up to a third of women surveyed would admit to going on a romantic date just to be invited to free dinner

was originally published in

Xataka Science

by
Sergio Parra

.

Read More